The natural history of QTc interval and its clinical impact in coronavirus disease 2019 survivors after 1 year.

Background and objective: Prolonged QTc interval on admission and a higher risk of death in SARS-CoV-2 patients have been reported. The long-term clinical impact of prolonged QTc interval is unknown. This study examined the relationship in COVID-19 survivors of a prolonged QTc on admission with long-term adverse events, changes in QTc duration and its impact on 1-year prognosis, and factors associated with a prolonged QTc at follow-up. Methods: We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study of 523 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients who were alive on discharge. An electrocardiogram was taken on these patients within the first 48 h after diagnosis and before the administration of any medication with a known effect on QT interval and repeated in 421 patients 7 months after discharge. Mortality, hospital readmission, and new arrhythmia rates 1 year after discharge were reviewed. Results: Thirty-one (6.3%) survivors had a baseline prolonged QTc. They were older, had more cardiovascular risk factors, cardiac disease, and comorbidities, and higher levels of terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. There was no relationship between prolonged QTc on admission and the 1-year endpoint (9.8% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.212). In 84% of survivors with prolonged baseline QTc, it normalized at 7.9 ± 2.2 months. Of the survivors, 2.4% had prolonged QTc at follow-up, and this was independently associated with obesity, ischemic cardiomyopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer. Prolonged baseline QTc was not independently associated with the composite adverse event at 1 year. Conclusions: Prolonged QTc in the acute phase normalized in most COVID-19 survivors and had no clinical long-term impact. Prolonged QTc at follow-up was related to the presence of obesity and previously acquired chronic diseases and was not related to 1-year prognosis.

Myocardial Injury in COVID-19 and Its Implications in Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is still a pandemic with high mortality and morbidity rates. Clinical manifestation is widely variable, including asymptomatic or mild respiratory tract illness to severe pneumonia and death. Myocardial injury is a significant pathogenic feature of COVID-19 and it is associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, mainly due to a higher number of hospital readmissions, with over 50% mortality. These findings suggest that myocardial injury would identify COVID-19 patients with higher risk during active infection and mid-term follow-up. Potential contributors responsible for myocardial damage are myocarditis, vasculitis, acute inflammation, type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction. However, there are few data about cardiac sequelae and its long-term consequences. Thus, the optimal screening tool for residual cardiac sequelae, clinical follow-up, and the benefits of a specific cardiovascular therapy during the convalescent phase remains unknown. This mini-review explores the different mechanisms of myocardial injury related to COVID-19 and its short and long-term implications.

Myocardial Injury as a Prognostic Factor in Mid- and Long-Term Follow-Up of COVID-19 Survivors.

Myocardial injury, which is present in >20% of patients hospitalized for COVID-19, is associated with increased short-term mortality, but little is known about its mid- and long-term consequences. We evaluated the association between myocardial injury with one-year mortality and readmission in 172 COVID-19 patients discharged alive. Patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of myocardial injury (defined by hs-cTn levels) on admission and matched by age and sex. We report mortality and hospital readmission at one year after admission in all patients and echocardiographic, laboratory and clinical data at six months in a subset of 86 patients. Patients with myocardial injury had a higher prevalence of hypertension (73.3% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.003), chronic kidney disease (10.5% vs. 2.35%, p = 0.06) and chronic heart failure (9.3% vs. 1.16%, p = 0.03) on admission. They also had higher mortality or hospital readmissions at one year (11.6% vs. 1.16%, p = 0.01). Additionally, echocardiograms showed thicker walls in these patients (10 mm vs. 8 mm, p = 0.002) but without functional disorder. Myocardial injury in COVID-19 survivors is associated with poor clinical prognosis at one year, independent of age and sex, but not with echocardiographic functional abnormalities at six months.

Impact of diabetes in patients waiting for invasive cardiac procedures during COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic, elective invasive cardiac procedures (ICP) have been frequently cancelled or postponed. Consequences may be more evident in patients with diabetes. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to identify the peculiarities of patients with DM among those in whom ICP were cancelled or postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to identify subgroups in which the influence of DM has higher impact on the clinical outcome. METHODS: We included 2,158 patients in whom an elective ICP was cancelled or postponed during COVID-19 pandemic in 37 hospitals in Spain. Among them, 700 (32.4%) were diabetics. Patients with and without diabetes were compared. RESULTS: Patients with diabetes were older and had a higher prevalence of other cardiovascular risk factors, previous cardiovascular history and co-morbidities. Diabetics had a higher mortality (3.0% vs. 1.0%; p = 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (1.9% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.001). Differences were especially important in patients with valvular heart disease (mortality 6.9% vs 1.7% [p < 0.001] and cardiovascular mortality 4.9% vs 0.9% [p = 0.002] in patients with and without diabetes, respectively). In the multivariable analysis, diabetes remained as an independent risk factor both for overall and cardiovascular mortality. No significant interaction was found with other clinical variables. CONCLUSION: Among patients in whom an elective invasive cardiac procedure is cancelled or postponed during COVID-19 pandemic, mortality and cardiovascular mortality is higher in patients with diabetes, irrespectively on other clinical conditions. These procedures should not be cancelled in patients with diabetes.

Prognostic Implications of Chronic Heart Failure and Utility of NT-proBNP Levels in Heart Failure Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and prognostic value of chronic heart failure (CHF) in the setting of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has seldom been studied. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence and prognosis of CHF in this setting. METHODS: This single-center study included 829 consecutive patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection from February to April 2020. Patients with a previous history of CHF were matched 1:2 for age and sex. We analyze the prognostic value of pre-existing CHF. Prognostic implications of N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels on admission in the CHF cohort were explored. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients (43 CHF and 86 non-CHF) where finally included. All-cause mortality was higher in CHF patients compared to non-CHF patients (51.2% vs. 29.1%, p = 0.014). CHF was independently associated with 30-day mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 2.3, confidence interval (CI) 95%: 1.26-2.4). Patients with CHF and high-sensitivity troponin T < 14 ng/L showed excellent prognosis. An NT-proBNP level > 2598 pg/mL on admission was associated with higher 30-day mortality in patients with CHF. CONCLUSIONS: All-cause mortality in CHF patients hospitalized due to SARS-CoV-2 infection was 51.2%. CHF was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR 2.3, CI 95% 1.26-4.2). NT-proBNP levels could be used for stratification risk purposes to guide medical decisions if larger studies confirm this finding.

Consequences of canceling elective invasive cardiac procedures during Covid-19 outbreak.

BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic in Spain, elective procedures were canceled or postponed, mainly due to health care systems overwhelming. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of interrupting invasive procedures in patients with chronic cardiac diseases due to the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain. METHODS: The study population is comprised of 2,158 patients that were pending on elective cardiac invasive procedures in 37 hospitals in Spain on the 14th of March 2020, when a state of alarm and subsequent lockdown was declared in Spain due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These patients were followed-up until April 31th. RESULTS: Out of the 2,158 patients, 36 (1.7%) died. Mortality was significantly higher in patients pending on structural procedures (4.5% vs. 0.8%, respectively; p < .001), in those >80 year-old (5.1% vs. 0.7%, p < .001), and in presence of diabetes (2.7% vs. 0.9%, p = .001), hypertension (2.0% vs. 0.6%, p = .014), hypercholesterolemia (2.0% vs. 0.9%, p = .026) [Correction added on December 23, 2020, after first online publication: as per Dr. Moreno's request changes in p-values were made after original publication in Abstract.], chronic renal failure (6.0% vs. 1.2%, p < .001), NYHA > II (3.8% vs. 1.2%, p = .001), and CCS > II (4.2% vs. 1.4%, p = .013), whereas was it was significantly lower in smokers (0.5% vs. 1.9%, p = .013). Multivariable analysis identified age > 80, diabetes, renal failure and CCS > II as independent predictors for mortality. CONCLUSION: Mortality at 45 days during COVID-19 outbreak in patients with chronic cardiovascular diseases included in a waiting list due to cancellation of invasive elective procedures was 1.7%. Some clinical characteristics may be of help in patient selection for being promptly treated when similar situations happen in the future.

[Markers of myocardial injury in the prediction of short-term COVID-19 prognosis]. / Marcadores de daño miocárdico en la predicción del pronóstico a corto plazo de los pacientes con COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 is currently causing high mortality and morbidity worldwide. Information on cardiac injury is scarce. We aimed to evaluate cardiovascular damage in patients with COVID-19 and determine the correlation of high-sensitivity cardiac-specific troponin T (hs-cTnT) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) with the severity of COVID-19. METHODS: We included 872 consecutive patients with confirmed COVID-19 from February to April 2020. We tested 651 patients for high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) and 506 for NT-proBNP on admission. Cardiac injury was defined as hs-TnT > 14 ng/L, the upper 99th percentile. Levels of NT-proBNP > 300 pg/mL were considered related to some extent of cardiac injury. The primary composite endpoint was 30-day mortality or mechanical ventilation (MV). RESULTS: Cardiac injury by hs-TnT was observed in 34.6% of our COVID-19 patients. Mortality or MV were higher in cardiac injury than noncardiac injury patients (39.1% vs 9.1%). Hs-TnT and NT-proBNP levels were independent predictors of death or MV (HR, 2.18; 95%CI, 1.23-3.83 and 1.87 (95%CI, 1.05-3.36), respectively) and of mortality alone (HR, 2.91; 95%CI, 1.211-7.04 and 5.47; 95%CI, 2.10-14.26, respectively). NT-ProBNP significantly improved the troponin model discrimination of mortality or MV (C-index 0.83 to 0.84), and of mortality alone (C-index 0.85 to 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial injury measured at admission was a common finding in patients with COVID-19. It reliably predicted the occurrence of mortality and need of MV, the most severe complications of the disease. NT-proBNP improved the prognostic accuracy of hs-TnT.

Influence of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular risk factors in Covid-19 patients. Data from a large prospective Spanish cohort

Introduction and objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a pandemic infection. Retrospective data showed worse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. We sought to evaluate the link between CVD and CV risk factors with in-hospital outcomes in COVID-19. Methods: We designed a prospective registry that included consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted at our institution. The inclusion period was from 27 February to 7 April 2020. Clinical outcomes were monitored up to 2 May 2020. Results: A total of 876 patients were included. Mean age was 62 ± 18 years old;47% were > 65 years of age. A total of 69% of patients had at least one CV risk factor;15% of the patients had previous history of CVD. Patients with previous CVD were significantly older (77 ± 11 vs 60 ± 18 years old;P < .01), with a higher proportion of men (64 vs 54%;P = .021) and showed a higher proportion of rise in both high-sensitivity cardiac-specific troponin-T (hs-cTnT) (78 vs 27%;P < .01) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (74 vs 29%;P < .01) on admission. Those patients with CV risk factors were also significantly older (68 ± 16 vs 49 ± 16 years old;P < .01), showing a higher percentage of patients fulfilling acute distress respiratory syndrome criteria (28 vs 21%;P = .021) and more need of mechanical ventilation (9 vs 4%;P < .01). Levels of hs-cTnT (44 vs 9%;P < .01) and NT-proBNP (43 vs 15%;P < .01) were more frequently elevated in patients with CV risk factors. Risk of death was significantly higher in patients with CVD (33 vs 8%;P < .01) or CV risk factors (16 vs 1%;P < .01). We found age > 65 years old (OR, 15;95%CI, 5-43), chronic congestive heart failure (OR, 3.27;95%CI, 1.38-7.72) and chronic kidney disease (OR, 8.55;95%CI, 1.47-5.46) as independent predictors of death. Conclusions: In patients admitted for COVID-19, CVD or CV risk factors are associated with an increased risk of death during hospitalization. We found that older age, history of congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease are independent predictors of death in COVID-19. Resumen Introducción y objetivos: La enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) se ha convertido en una enfermedad pandémica. Datos de estudios retrospectivos han mostrado una peor evolución en pacientes con enfermedad cardiovascular (ECV) y factores de riesgo cardiovascular (FRCV). Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar la relación entre la ECV y los FRCV con la evolución hospitalaria de pacientes con COVID-19. Métodos: Se diseñó un registro prospectivo que incluyó a pacientes consecutivos con COVID-19 ingresados en nuestro centro hospitalario. El periodo de inclusión abarcó desde el 27 de febrero al 7 de abril de 2020. Se monitorizaron los eventos clínicos hasta el 2 de mayo de 2020. Resultados: Se incluyó un total de 876 pacientes. La edad media fue de 62 ± 18 años;un 47% fueron > 65 años. Un 69% de los pacientes tenían al menos un FRCV;un 15% tenían ECV previa. Aquellos pacientes con ECV fueron significativamente más mayores (77 ± 11 frente a 60 ± 18 años;p < 0,01), con una mayor proporción de varones (64 frente a 54%;p = 0,021) y mostraron en mayor proporción, en el momento del ingreso hospitalario, elevación de troponina T ultrasensible (hs-cTnT) (78 frente a 27%;p < 0,01) y de fracción aminoterminal del propéptido natriurético cerebral tipo B (NT-proBNP) (74 frente a 29%;p < 0,01). Aquellos pacientes con FRCV fueron significativamente más mayores (68 ± 16 frente a 49 ± 16 años;p < 0,01), mostrando un mayor porcentaje de pacientes que cumplían criterios diagnósticos de síndrome de distrés respiratorio agudo (28 frente a 21%;p = 0,021) y un mayor porcentaje de necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva (9 frente a 4%;p < 0,01). Los pacientes con FRCV presentaron con mayor frecuencia elevación de los niveles de hs-cTnT (44 frente a 9%;p < 0,01) y NT-proBNP (43 frente a 15%;p < 0,01). El riesgo de muerte fue significativamente mayor en los pacientes con ECV (33 frente a 8%;p < 0,01) o FRCV (16 frente a 1%;p < 0,01). La edad > 65 años (OR = 15;IC95% 5-43), la insuficiencia cardiaca (OR = 3.27;IC95%, 1.38-7.72) y la insuficiencia renal crónica (OR = 8.55;IC95%, 1.47-5.46) fueron predictores independientes de mortalidad hospitalaria por COVID-19. Conclusiones: En pacientes ingresados por COVID-19, la presencia de ECV o FRCV se asocia con un mayor riesgo de muerte durante la hospitalización. Una mayor edad, la historia de insuficiencia cardiaca y la insuficiencia renal crónica fueron predictores independientes de muerte por COVID-19.

Prolonged QT Interval in SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Prevalence and Prognosis.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of a prolonged QT interval in SARS-Cov2 infection is not well known. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the presence of a prolonged QT on admission is an independent factor for mortality in SARS-Cov2 hospitalized patients. METHODS: Single-center cohort of 623 consecutive patients with positive polymerase-chain-reaction test (PCR) to SARS Cov2, recruited from 27 February to 7 April 2020. An electrocardiogram was taken on these patients within the first 48 h after diagnosis and before the administration of any medication with a known effect on QT interval. A prolonged QT interval was defined as a corrected QT (QTc) interval >480 milliseconds. Patients were followed up with until 10 May 2020. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (9.8%) had prolonged QTc and only 3.2% had a baseline QTc > 500 milliseconds. Patients with prolonged QTc were older, had more comorbidities, and higher levels of immune-inflammatory markers. There were no episodes of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation during hospitalization. All-cause death was higher in patients with prolonged QTc (41.0% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001, multivariable HR 2.68 (1.58-4.55), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Almost 10% of patients with COVID-19 infection have a prolonged QTc interval on admission. A prolonged QTc was independently associated with a higher mortality even after adjustment for age, comorbidities, and treatment with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. An electrocardiogram should be included on admission to identify high-risk SARS-CoV-2 patients.